Dealing with Difficult People
The Lighter Side
Books
Products
Teleclasses
Coaching
  Dealing with difficult people blog  
  Ask Dr. Koob  
  Lighter Side  
  Musings  
  Submissions  
  Resources  
  About Us  
  Contact  
  Quick Reference  
  Member's Login  
  Metacoach LLC  
     
   7 Steps to Dealing with Difficult People  
  Contributions  
     
  From the Blog  
   

 

 

Writing Contest Winners 2005

[See below for tentative contest(s) for 2006]

First Place

$400

This story wonderfully reflects some of the key concepts we espouse on this web site.

Disability and Difficult Attitudes


Jody Courtney

I was born with a disability, so I have dealt with difficult people all my life. Through all my dealing with these thousands of people I have learned one thing. When dealing with difficult people keeping one’s sanity takes effort and focus. This is my story of how I keep my sanity (well, for the most part) when dealing with difficult people.


My disability (cerebral palsy) affects my speech, vision, and motor skills. I also must use a power wheelchair because I wasn’t able to learn to walk. Despite all of these limitations, I find dealing with people is one of the most frustrating things about living with a disability. Many come in contact with difficult people within the workplace, the family, or in one’s network of acquaintances. Not me, the most frustrating people I come in contact with are strangers.


It is not that I believe most people are difficult; it is just their misconceptions and attitudes of people with disabilities are difficult. Dealing with stares, receiving unwanted pity, being treated as a child, and having elected officials misunderstand disability issues are very draining.


As a child through my early twenties I used denial and overcompensation to deal with these situations. During my elementary school experience, I was pushed by a teacher to be the best student that I could be. She taught that I had to work hard in order to prove that I was as good as anyone -- even the students without disabilities. I came to believe that it was my responsibility to change the attitudes that people had toward me. As you will read later, this belief had to change for the sake of my own well-being.


I wanted to disprove the perception that people with disabilities -- especially those with speech impairments -- were slow, friendless, and had no lives. (It’s funny that even as a small child I knew people had misconceptions about me.) I spent hours upon hours doing homework to keep up with the other (normal) students. Being the best was my mission. I had to have the top grades. I had to be number one in everything. I also had to be the best buddy to everyone. I had to be outgoing, funny, and involved in every organization possible. I lived this way even after my college years. I really thought if I was a good enough person, the staring would stop and society would see me just like any other person.


I would always deny the hurt I felt when I was stared at as I shopped at the mall. I would deny the anger that I felt when a teacher questioned the wisdom of placing me in his/her classroom. I would deny the embarrassment I felt when waitresses would ask my non-disabled friends what I wanted to order. I would deny my feelings countless of time in order to press onward in my mission of trying to eliminate the difficult attitudes of people. My thinking was that people would think better of me if they thought I had it all together, which meant “never letting them see me sweat.”


I had failed to realize that living to change people is no way to live. After years of trying to change the difficult perceptions of society, I emotionally hit rock bottom. It took me awhile to understand what led me to my depression: I was so obsessed with changing the difficult attitudes I faced that I didn’t realize I had bought into the idea that I was somehow inferior to others. If I could change society’s perception of me, then it would mean I wouldn’t have any reason to feel inferior. I learned it wasn’t people who were driving me nuts, it was myself.


It is taking time, but I am learning to accept the God-given value I received when I was born. I am a wonderful woman, even with my physical disability. I don’t need to use overcompensation and denial to feel good about who I am. The more I truly wrap this way of thinking around my mind, the less of a need I have to change the difficult attitudes found within non understanding and prejudice. It doesn’t matter if the common Joe sees me as a child and then underestimates me. Of course, it would be my hope that if he meets me, he will gain disability awareness and see me in a different light. However, I don’t feel the responsibility anymore to “open his eyes” to the fact that people with disabilities are more than their limitations.


Am I going to continue doing disability advocacy to ensure that Americans with disabilities are included in society. You bet I will! However, my motivation has changed. I don’t need to educate and advocate to prove my worth or to seek approval from others. I want to educate and advocate because I do have worth, and I can make a difference.


What about you? Are you trying to change a difficult attitude in society? Are you doing it because it is the right thing to do or do you need to do it for self-acceptance? Take it from me, changing society isn’t the way to your worth. You will still be you, even if you can’t make EVERYONE understand your worth.

 

Jody Courtney is a disability advocate who resides in Muncie, Indiana. She has recently decided to focus on her writing career. Her goal is not only to educate society on disability issues but to provide encouragement to those who are living with them.

 

"In a nutshell, the story is a true story that is based on my experiences as a woman with a disability.... I just wanted to write that people-both with and without disabilities- don't have to be imprisoned by the difficult attitudes of others. We are more than what is seen from the outside."

 

 

Second Place

$150

 

A great difficult situation story that is well-written and handled with aplomb and 'the right stuff.'

["Negativity breeds Negativity

Positivity breeds Positivity

Choose Wisely"

difficultpeople.org]

“No Doesn’t Always Mean No”

 

By Brenda L. Whiteway

 

A few months ago my husband and I came to the conclusion that our leased vehicle needed to be replaced. Since we had been very happy with this particular model, and were pleased with the dealer’s service, we sought to lease the latest version. We were met by our salesman with smiles and handshakes, breezed through the paperwork, and went home to await the call that our car was ready to pick up.

 

A few days later we received a call from the dealership, and their financial administrator told us that we had been turned down. When asked, he could not give a reason as to why their financial division had made this decision, and truly seemed as dismayed as we were. Being a business woman myself, I am not inclined to take a vague ‘no’ as a final answer.

 

After careful thought, I realized that approaching the dealership would be fruitless – the financial part of leases is not under their control. I considered making my case to the leasing division that had handed down the decision, but assumed that since they would not provide their unfortunate messenger with a reason, they were unlikely to provide me with one either. I also knew that a terse non-response from them would only bring out my argumentative side, and I would be no further ahead. Ultimately, I decided the only way I was likely to gain success would be to go straight to the top. I wrote two letters: the first was to the national vice-president, outlining in detail our predicament; the second was to the international CEO, which included a copy of the first letter. In writing to the CEO I was careful not to repeat my story, since he could read the attachment if he had the interest and the time. I made clear my respect for his position, but also took the opportunity to draw on the fact that we shared some mutual associations through a professional organization. I summed up by respectfully requesting his assistance, and thanking him for his time and effort. Here are the letters.

 

Letter #1:

Mr. G. K. Smith, Executive Vice President
Primo Credit Company Inc.
809 Miller Court, Ste. 204
Any City, Anywhere

 

Dear Mr. Smith,

Re: Lease #5489246

 

On May 1, 2000 you were kind enough to welcome me as a new customer to Primo Credit Canada Inc. At that time, I had leased a 2000 Primo Sorrel and over the past 4 years have been extremely pleased with both the vehicle, and your customer service. On many occasions I have been very vocal to both family and colleagues about the quality of the vehicle, and the wonderful, personalized customer service that left us feeling extremely well cared for. In fact, my ‘raving’ encouraged my father to the extent that he leased his own Primo vehicle a couple of years ago (he had not been a Primo customer before then). My father-in-law also visited our dealer and looked into the possibility of obtaining one of your vehicles. When my company was looking for a new delivery vehicle, Primo was short listed as a definite possibility, again, due to my personal satisfaction with Primo.

 

In light of the above, and considering that we maintained a regular payment schedule and complied with all aspects of the lease as they pertain to regular maintenance, one would have to agree that we have been good customers.

 

Now that we are nearing the end of our lease, we have visited our dealer to inquire about moving into a new vehicle. We completed the required paperwork, which we assumed was merely a formality and anxiously awaited word that our new vehicle was ready to be picked up. Imagine my shock and disappointment when I received a call that we had been turned down! After recovering, I asked the inevitable ‘But why?’ and was told that there had been no reason given, only that the decision was final.

 

I understand that the employees who routinely handle the credit applications have a formula that they are instructed to follow. However, it must be said that customers do not always conform to an exact formula, but are often good customers nonetheless. Being a businesswoman myself, I simply can’t imagine that you would be prepared to thoughtlessly discard quality customers such as ourselves. This is simply not acceptable.

 

I would be grateful if you would take the time to reconsider Primo’s position, so that we can continue what I have believed to be a very fruitful relationship for us both. It would be a huge disappointment indeed if I found myself in the position of needing to share such a negative experience with all those to whom I have done much ‘bragging’. I also would not welcome the thought of needing to obtain a sub-standard vehicle elsewhere, when we have been so pleased with our Sorrel.

 

I await your careful consideration and positive response to this matter. You will find my contact information on my enclosed business card, and my personal contact information at the bottom of this letter.

Letter #2:

Personal & Confidential
Mr. Anderson, CEO
Primo Canada Inc.
1 Primo Place

Any City, Anywhere

 

Dear Mr. Anderson,

 

I believe that you may be in a position to assist me. You will see by the attached that I am having some difficulty in leasing a second vehicle from Primo. I’m sure that somewhere along the line there are good employees simply trying to do their jobs, but every now and then I believe that cooler, and more senior heads must prevail.

 

Since you and I have not had the pleasure of meeting, let me tell you a little more about myself than I chose to share in the attached letter. Being a businesswoman of over 20 years, I have learned many things. (Due to my stubborn nature, some of them the hard way!) However, one of the most basic rules I’ve learned – and I’m sure you will agree – is that a company never turns away a solid, reliable, repeat customer. I don’t believe that I am alone in this line of thinking. In fact, you and I have some associates in common whom I am positive would agree as well. As it turns out, Mr. Bernard Svenson, your Managing Director in Stokholm, and Mr. Daniel Tremone (Quality Assurance Engineer) and Mrs. Tina Benson (Capital Investment Specialist), both of New York share a joint fellowship with me in the International Professional Business Association. As you may know, this is a highly respected fellowship, and membership is attained only by nomination through a peer who is already a member. I was inducted in 2001, and have gleaned many fruitful and educational associations through its membership.

 

Since it is not my wish to take up too much of your valuable time, I will leave you to peruse the following pages. If there is anything you can do on my behalf, I would be truly grateful indeed.

I sent off the letters, and held my breath. To my delight, I received a call to go to the dealership a few days later. The gentleman who had originally called to give me the bad news emerged from his office, smiling. He extended his hand on his way to greet me and said, “I just wanted to shake your hand. I’ve been in this business for many years and I have never seen anything like this.” He continued to explain that he had received a phone call, although he wouldn’t say from whom, that had consisted of only five words:

“Give the lady her car.”

 

This story is based on real events, although the names have been changed to protect the difficult! This is Brenda’s first attempt at writing for publication. After ill health forced her to leave her executive position in May 2004, she turned to writing as a way of keeping her mind active. She hopes to parlay her writing into a second career. She resides in Toronto with her husband and three children.

 

Honorable Mention

A key component of this story is self-awareness and the willingness to change.

Key difficultpeople.org concepts.


KNOCKOUT!!!


Karla Sealy


I trudged from the parking lot to the main entrance of the office building where I worked. “Another day at the office,” I mumbled to myself, shoulders slumped with resignation. I worked at a small financial consulting firm in Manhattan. Employed there for fifteen years, this job had been my lucky break after graduate school. The firm was relatively small, approximately thirty-five employees, we each had our own cubicle and spent every day crunching numbers at our respective computers. This was the routine and everything had been going smoothly up until a month ago when management changed. May 1st, 2005 marked the arrival of Mrs. Elizabeth Charles. And so, the fight began.

 

Round 1: Mrs. Charles vs. the Office

 

My first introduction to my new manager came via a memo sitting on my desk. I would now be working with three of my colleagues in an expanded work area. Immediately, I felt resentment, “How dare she take away my independence, my privacy, my…” What concerned me least was the fact that I did not even recognize any of the names on the list.

 

Round 2: Mrs. Charles vs. Me

 

Fuming, I stormed through the open door of my manager’s office. Ranting and raving, I paced the floor, expressing my outrage. Mrs. Charles sat calmly and when I was finished, she gestured for me to have a seat. “You are definitely one of our most outstanding and intelligent employees and I give you credit for that. However, how well do you know any of your colleagues? Do you not think that you could all make greater contributions in a team setting?” Blinded by my anger, I disagreed strongly and stormed out.

 

Round 3: Me vs. Me

 

Months passed. After my tirade, I expected Mrs. Charles to ask for my resignation. However, nothing more was said of the incident. I continued to talk about her in the office and outside. “Some people are so difficult, thinking they know what’s better for everyone else.” I never tired of anything negative to say. Eventually, eight months later, Mrs. Charles went on extended leave for several weeks. Of course, I let everyone know how overjoyed I was about the break.


Then one evening I was walking through the supermarket with my husband and our two children. Rounding the corner, I passed Mrs. Charles’ husband. All employees had met him once at a staff function. He greeted me enthusiastically, grasping my hand, and asking me how I was doing. When I inquired after him and his wife, all of a sudden, his eyes welled with tears. “Elizabeth died two nights ago. She had cancer which spread, that was the reason for her leave. We haven’t made the announcement to the office yet. I’ve been meaning to come in but…” He broke off in tears.


I was stunned. “Elizabeth really enjoyed her time at the firm,” he continued, “since she found about her cancer, she wanted to do something that made a difference.” And in that moment, it all made sense. I was so blinded that I hadn’t even realized the effect that Mrs. Charles’ changes had had on my life…

 

I no longer hung my shoulders coming into the office. I socialized with colleagues and shared ideas, family concerns and the like. As my job satisfaction improved, so too did my life at home. I now spent more time talking to my husband and playing with my kids.

 

I had been the difficult person, hard to communicate with, impossible to deal with.

 

…I hugged Mr. Charles and we both cried together.

 

Round 4: KNOCKOUT

 

One year later. I stood up in front of all the staff to give my weekly reminder. Since, the death of Mrs. Charles, I had written all of the lessons she strove to teach and delivered weekly notices to motivate each employee. In the last year, we had held numerous sessions. Discussions ranged from respect for self, respecting the opinions of others, celebrating diversity in the workplace and the importance of cooperation. I never forgot Mrs. Charles and now, whenever I encounter someone who I perceive to be difficult, I stop and remember what she taught me.

 

“If you judge people, you have no time to love them.” (Mother Teresa).

 

Karla writes to us from Barbados. Interests: Reading, writing, going to beach, kickboxing
Why I entered: I saw the contest and thought it could be interesting. I used to dream of writing when i was younger but my family and teachers always said sciences were the way to go. I want to start writing when I can and this contest gave me the opportunity to engage in something fun.

 

 

Honorable Mention

Perceptions are everything. This story touches onmany key issues with difficult people in the workplace. Nicely sets the stage for many of the issues we discuss at difficultpeople.org.

 

My life with Curt


Dan Markham

 

Curt Harwood makes my life miserable. Well, he makes everyone’s life miserable, but mine more than anyone else’s.


Curt is that guy at the office. The one fellow no one likes to be around. Sadly, I have no choice. Curt and I share a space at the office.


It’s not just one thing about Curt that drives others away. It’s his complete and total Curtness.
He’s bitter. He’s confrontational. And yes, he’s curt. (No one ever said the name didn’t fit.)


Most of his co-workers couldn’t identify just why he is so despised. And he doesn’t even have to try. It’s just a natural occurrence; something that comes out as soon as he walks through the front door here at Amalgamated Products and Services. It’s hard to tell whether it’s his grunted replies to simple “hellos,” or the suspicious glances he shoots on occasion, or something else entirely.


Other times, he just blisters folks with his foul mouth and fouler attitude.


Just look at the way he treated Connie Reardon. Connie is undeniably the sweetest, friendliest woman who works here. In fact, her positive attitude is the only thing that saved her after the merger, when the company enacted its “personnelization restructurement.” And yes, that’s what it was called. It seems the term “downsizing” had taken on strangely negative overtones, so the corporate Einsteins decided that it needed a euphemism for the euphemism for massive layoffs. Understandable from a public relations standpoint, I suppose, though they might have been better off with a phrase that used actual words.


Anyway, Connie’s old job was swallowed up, but Mr. Hanrahan didn’t have the heart to fire her, so now she just handles various, mindless chores. Often, that involves running around the office delivering messages or summoning employees, something the intercom could handle at a fraction of the cost, if Hanrahan ever learned how to use it. But he just dispatches Connie, who at least is a more welcome presence than the static that precedes any intercom messages.


Well, except to Curt.


I remember the time Connie stopped by the office, knocked lightly and gently said, “Excuse me, sir.”
“What,” Curt asked, in a tone of voice generally restricted to angry coaches or spirit-filled pastors.
“I’ve got a package for you, sir.”


“Just leave it on the desk, dammit.”


“Thank you, sir.”


Sure, this could have been a once-in-a-blue moon outburst? Or a frustrated employee faced with a deadline crunch? Instead, it was this morning. It may be repeated tomorrow.


But Connie keeps trying, unlike most of Curt’s co-workers. She steadfastly believes that Curt will eventually come around, that he just needs a little encouragement.


Bill McAfee takes a different approach. Under normal circumstances, Bill is a pretty quiet guy, keeps to himself. He’s got a quick wit when he takes the time to display it; yet with Curt, he’s a completely different fellow.


Bill goes on the offensive, literally. He’s rude, profane and antagonistic, automatically taking any position he knows Curt doesn’t hold. He’s basically Curt’s Curt. The gambit works, as he invariably repels Curt. His co-workers are amazed at his transformation, and marvel at the results, though no one else has the courage to try it.


Instead, the rest of the employees here at Amalgamated have developed other techniques for dealing with Curt. Or, more frequently, not dealing with him.


Some handle this avoidance expertly. Urgent cell phone calls invariably arise when Curt steps into a co-workers’ sightlines. These calls are pre-programmed, though no one would share that trade secret.
Others are less graceful, but no less effective. A clearing of the throat and a manufactured excuse are often implemented to extract oneself from Curt’s noxious presence.


What’s worse, Curt is basically powerless to change it. New hires are immediately indoctrinated on the necessity of avoiding Curt. It’s probably written into the company’s orientation schedule by now.
And it’s not restricted to individuals.


Lunch time plans are never discussed around Curt, for fear he might tag along. He’s never included in any group projects, as enough associates begging off have convinced the managers to look elsewhere for brainstorming partners. And if Curt shuffles into the break room, you can bet that a roomful of bookkeepers, maintenance men and salespersons will suddenly get the urge to return to their jobs. If Hanrahan were smart, and no indictment on that charge would ever stick, he’d allow Curt three hours of break time per day and watch the company’s productivity skyrocket.


The bosses are certainly aware of Curt’s unwelcome presence. He’s been repeatedly bypassed for deserved promotions, presumably because upper-level management has no desire to work more closely with him either. He’s never invited to any gatherings or presentations that include customers or suppliers for fear of the lasting impression he might leave.


Clearly Curt hates his job. He’s good at it, there’s no denying that, but it certainly brings him no pleasure.
What’s really odd is that none of the people outside Curt’s office could ever imagine he would be so unpopular at work.


His wife, Margaret, is a charming woman who adores Curt, and he her. And while his teenage daughter Megan has begun to rebel against virtually everything Margaret stands for, she remains devoted to her dad. Unfortunately, his 11-year-old son Mike is beginning to show a few Curt-like tendencies, though he remains a pretty good kid at heart.


And Curt has plenty of friends. The guys on his softball team regularly invite him over for picnics and ballgames. He’s a deacon at his church, and the whole family gets together monthly with others from the congregation for pitch-ins and volunteer work. Yup, Curt can be downright helpful.

 

Just not here. During the eight hours, five days a week (and occasionally six, when the company’s running at top production), Curt is just the miserable cuss who sucks the life out of every room he enters.
And it won’t end soon. Curt has a full five years until he’s eligible for early retirement, which he’ll undeniably take. And if Curt hesitated, the company would surely sweeten his incentive package. The owners might even get the rest of the employees to chip in for Curt’s parting gifts.


I can’t wait for that day either. In five years, I, Curtis Anthony Harwood, will finally be free of that poisonous presence known to all he works with as Curt.

 

"I'm a freelance writer from Indiana. I have contributed essays to two books, Dale Earnhardt: The Final Record and Our Fathers Who Art in Heaven. I don't think I have much in common with Curt, though others may disagree."

Writing Contest Ideas 2006

We are planning on at least one contest running from January 1st, 2006 through June 30th, possibly two. Input from members and writers always welcome: responses@difficultpeople.org.

 

Contest Idea 1

 

Submissions akin to our weekly newsletter "Musings" (Go to 'Musings' section of site). $5 per entry. Poignant, inspiring, humorous messages/stories/thoughts; 1 to 2 double spaced, typed pages. Must be original, though can be based around a quote (credit must be given).

 

We will have a disk available for purchase in the near future that will include the first 2 1/2 years of 'Musings' for those who want to see the gamut of possibilities.

 

Contest Idea 2

Short story contest similar to this year's. $10 per entry. Poignant, inspiring, humorous stories related to the important ideas espoused on this site.

 

Stay tuned for future details!

Your contributions can help continue this free section of this site and keep costs for contests, etc. at a minimum. We sincerely appreciate any support you can give.